The best musical streaming services in 2023, musical streaming platforms, a revolution in progress – digital century
Musical streaming platforms, a current revolution
The latest, streaming platforms draw its origin in a technology & nbsp: peer-to-peer. However, ” There are several birth acts. Primary is the CD “, He believes. Object today abandoned, if not forgotten, the CD for Compact-Disc, is the first mass digitization of music, in the early 1980s. “” Before, music was a purely acoustic wave. There, it becomes 0 and 1 on CD “He explains, before deepening,” When you connect two computers together, in theory, you can pass these 0 and 1 by a cable between computers and then by internet. So from the moment we have the CD, we germinate all the digitization, the world of music today »».
The best musical streaming services in 2023
Streaming music is essential worldwide. After slowly killing physical supports, streaming is there to last. Spotify reigns supreme with nearly a third of the subscribers all platforms combined. That are worth its competitors and how to choose from a fairly wide offer but which seems similar from one service to another at first ? This file gives you access to all the information and all the figures. You have all the cards in hand to choose the best musical streaming service: the one that suits you.
Streaming signs the end of physical supports
Streaming has clearly imposed itself From 2015. The American market below (RIAA figures), which can be replicated identically in most countries in Eastern Europe, including France, presents:
The result is final. Streaming is by far the most used way to listen to music. The number of subscribers in the world was 132.6 million in 2016, He went to 523.9 million in 2021. (Midia figures).
We no longer compare the CD against the K7 Audio and the Vinyl. We no longer try to know if digital sound is better than analog sound. Musical streaming acclaimed by the general public asks a main question: What a service is for me ?
All figures for streaming platforms
The distribution of musical streaming in France
As in the rest of the world, Spotify stands out as the most popular service in France. He is followed by Deezer, Amazon Music, YouTube Music and Apple Music. The order is slightly different from the world market. And then certain services are specific to certain markets, in China and on the African continent for example. As for high-end Qobuz and Tidal audio quality services, they do not appear on the graph below. Is the service in mind, however, the best musical streaming service ? This is what we will discover through this article.
The turnover of streaming services
Several factors can explain the current classification. Spotify is one of the pioneers, however it was launched a year after Deezer and Qobuz. These are the strategic, marketing and investment choices that have placed Spotify in mind today. When in an area a leader gets ahead, it necessarily takes a lot of time to his competitors to join him.
Amazon, Apple and YouTube do not communicate on turnover. These are three services dependent on the three largest tech companies in the world. They do not detail the results by trade, so we will not know how the revenues of these three services are located vis-à-vis other companies that do musical streaming and nothing else.
On reading this table, even if the available figures do not all date from the same exercises, there is a similarity in terms of turnover between Deezer, Napster, Soundcloud and Tidal. However, Deezer’s turnover would have doubled since 2015 to increase to 400M €, but I have not been able to validate my source on this subject.
Country | Year Creation | Nb of employees | Nb of country | Figure business | |
Amazon Music Unlimited | UNITED STATES | 2007 | – | 48 (2021) | – |
Apple Music | UNITED STATES | 2015 | – | 167 (2020) | – |
Deezer | France | 2007 | 600 (2020) | 185 (2020) | 400M € (2021) |
Napster | UNITED STATES | 2011 (ex-Rhapsody) | 163 (2021) | 31 (2021) | $ 210M (2019) |
Qobuz | France | 2007 | 70 (2021) | 18 (2021) | 12M € (2020) |
Soundcloud | Germany | 2008 | 417 (2021) | 190 (2021) | $ 218M (2020) |
Spotify | Sweden | 2008 | 7690 (2021) | 178 (2021) | $ 9.67B (2021) |
Tidal | UNITED STATES | 2014 | 343 (2021) | 61 (2021) | $ 166M (2019) |
YouTube Music | UNITED STATES | 2015 | – | 100 (2021) | – |
The number of subscribers for each platform
Let’s put aside the financial aspect and we are now interested in the number of subscribers, a figure that speaks to everyone. The graph below includes each time the sum of the paying subscribers and subscribers to the free version of the service when it exists. It confirms the advancement of Spotify. Soundcloud is in second place thanks to its free use that does not require a subscription, the figures therefore include users without account.
The three Apple/Amazon/YouTube giants come just behind with very close figures. The following three in a pocket handkerchief in terms of turnover also follow each other in number of subscribers. Reading this graph may suggest that Apple, Amazon and YouTube services could each be exceeded in the billion dollars in turnover.
All prices for musical streaming subscriptions
To enjoy all of its advantages, the best musical streaming service requires a paid subscription. Most are taken every month, some are available in the form of an annual purchase. However, in order to attract you better, platforms offer a free subscription. It is obviously limited and accompanied by advertising. Finally, recently two services have been available only associated with equipment specific for a reduced rate.
Paid monthly subscriptions
All streaming services operate on the principle of the monthly subscription. For a small sum, you can Use the service without any limit, 24 hours a day if you wish. The prices are quite similar from one platform to another with in general a cost of € 9.99 per month.
This first summary table The 9 most used streaming services in France. It gives an idea of the differences for the four types of conventional subscriptions: individual, duo, family and student. We detail later which justifies the differences in prices between the platforms.
French streaming services Deezer and Qobuz are the only ones to offer Annual subscriptions. The sum may seem important to go out suddenly, but it generally makes it possible to save 15 to 25%.
Test offer | 1 user | 2 users | Family (6 pers.)) | Student | |
Amazon Music Unlimited | 3 months | € 9.99 | – | € 14.99 | – |
Apple Music | 1 month | € 9.99 | – | € 14.99 | € 4.99 |
Deezer Premium Deezer Premium Annual | 3 months | € 10.99 € 8.24 (1) | – – | € 17.99 – | € 5.99 – |
Napster | 30 days | € 9.95 | – | – | – |
Qobuz Studio Premier Qobuz Studio First Annual Qobuz Sublime Studio | 1 month | € 14.99 € 12.50 € 199.99 (2) | € 19.99 € 17.50 € 299.88 (2) | € 24.99 € 20.83 € 349.99 (2) | – – – |
Soundcloud Go Soundcloud Go+ | 7 days 30 days | € 4.99 (3) € 9.99 | – – | – – | – € 4.99 |
Spotify Premium | 1 month | € 9.99 | € 12.99 | € 15.99 | € 4.99 |
Tidal Hifi Tidal Hifi Plus | 30 days | € 9.99 (4) € 19.99 | – – | € 14.99 (4) € 29.99 | € 4.99 (4) € 9.99 |
YouTube Music | 1 month | € 9.99 | – | € 14.99 | € 4.99 |
Monthly cost of subscriptions to streaming services
(1) Deezer offers an annual subscription for its solo offer at € 98.90 instead of € 131.80.
(2) Qobuz offers two types of subscriptions: first and sublime. The second differs by its preferential prices for legal purchase of titles or albums and by an necessarily annual subscription. The first subscription is available to monthly or annual payment.
(3) Soundcloud offers two Go and Go+subscriptions, the first is limited in number of titles, without Soundcloud specifying the exact quantity.
(4) Tidal offers two types of subscriptions that are differentiated by audio quality: CD for one, hi-res for the other.
Free subscriptions
Four platforms also offer free offers. They have certain limits but They mainly add advertising. The Amazon Music Prime subscription is free if you already have an Amazon Prime subscription. In return, you have access to 2 million titles instead of 90 million in the paid offer.
The free DEEZER and Spotify subscriptions are accompanied by more or less invasive advertising. At Deezer, research is limited as well as audio quality. In Spotify, the reading order can be binding between random reading and reorganization of lists.
The free SoundCloud offer is the least provided. You will not find the original albums, reserved for the paid offer. However, many alternative and live versions remain accessible. And there are also millions of titles and remixes offered in the free offer by artists seeking to make themselves known.
2. The audio quality of musical streaming
If the quantity of titles offered by one or the other of the services has failed to guide your choice, the audio quality may be a weight argument. Depending on your expectations and especially the quality of your listening equipment, it may be interesting to turn to a service offering CD or hi-res quality.
High resolution audio brings a wider bandwidth, a feeling of higher ventilation and precision. You really have to have an audio equipment related to take advantage of it, otherwise the investment is useless: a wired helmet or a high -quality hifi system.
CD quality is accessible at € 9.99 per month at Deezer and Tidal. But for the same price, Amazon Music Unlimited and Apple Music offer hi-res and 3D audio.
Audio quality | Speed | Codecs | 3D audio | |
Amazon Music Unlimited | Hi-Rés 24/192 | < 9216 kbps | Flac | Atmos, 360ra |
Apple Music | Hi-Rés 24/192 | < 9216 kbps | AAC | Atmosphere |
Free Deezer Deezer Premium | compressed CD quality | 128 kbps < 1411 kbps | MP3 Flac | – 360ra |
Napster | compressed | 320 kbps | MP3 | – |
Qobuz Studio Premier | Hi-Rés 24/192 | < 9216 kbps | Flac | – |
Soundcloud | compressed | 256 kbps | AAC | – |
Spotify Free Spotify Premium | compressed compressed | 160 kbps 256 kbps | AAC AAC | – – |
Tidal Hifi Tidal Hifi Plus | CD quality Hi-Rés 24/192 | < 1411 kbps < 9216 kbps | Flac MQA | – Atmos, 360ra |
YouTube Music | compressed | 320 kbps | AAC | – |
3. Reading applications
All services are accessible on smartphones and tablets, iOS and Android. There is no exception. Ergonomics and features may differ, this will be the occasion for a next comparative article dedicated to mobile applications.
If you want to take advantage of your subscription From your computer, Some platforms offer dedicated applications to install for Mac and PC, at Amazon, Deezer, Qobuz, Spotify and Tidal. Napster and Soundcloud have not renewed their Windows application since 2017 and do not offer a Mac application.
Also be aware that all services offer the online reading, Accessible via the Internet browser. This allows listening to computer alternative to dedicated applications.
Android | iOS | macos | Windows | |
Amazon Music Unlimited | ||||
Apple Music | Original installed | No | ||
Deezer | ||||
Napster | No | |||
Qobuz | ||||
Soundcloud | No | |||
Spotify | ||||
Tidal | ||||
YouTube Music | No | No |
4. Compatibility with wireless speakers
Musical streaming is listening to a smartphone but also directly with connected audio equipment such as wireless speakers and other network players. They do not include all the platforms, With the exception of Sonos which has made it a recognized competitive advantage of it.
We have restricted this table to Five largest wireless speaker sellers on the market. For each brand, you can verify what the integrated streaming services are, directly accessible from the mobile application of the speaker. Above all, we observe that two of the most used services in the world and not least, Apple Music and YouTube Music, are compatible with any Hifi wireless speaker, excluding Sonos.
The Amazon, Apple and Google services are of course compatible with their respective intelligent speakers: Amazon Echo, Apple Homepod and Google Nest Home.
Amazon Music Unlimited | |||||
Apple Music | – | – | – | – | |
Deezer | |||||
Napster | – | ||||
Qobuz | – | – | |||
Soundcloud | – | – | – | ||
Spotify | |||||
Tidal | – | ||||
YouTube Music | – | – | – | – |
5. What customer support for streaming services ?
The use of a streaming service is not necessarily Simple for everyone. Questions can be asked during the first uses. In addition, technical problems may possibly appear over time. This requires having access to help from the platform, whatever the form: FAQ, Form, Cat and even Telephone.
Not all services facilitate your task. With YouTube Music for example, you will literally have to fend for yourself, unless you can find well -hidden direct contact on one of the many Google sites. In contrast, Deezer has created an assistance service to cite as an example. Customer service is accessible by all possible means and the online knowledge base is exhaustive and well organized.
Page support | Faq | Form | Cat | Forum | Phone | ||
Amazon Music Unlimited | Support | Faq | – | – | Auto reminder. | ||
Apple Music | Support | Faq | – | Auto reminder. | |||
Deezer | Support | Faq | 01 55 80 69 00 | ||||
Napster | Support | Faq | – | – | – | ||
Qobuz | Support | Faq | – | – | – | ||
Soundcloud | Support | Faq | – | – | – | – | |
Spotify | Support | Faq | – | – | – | ||
Tidal | Support | Faq | – | – | – | – | |
YouTube Music | – | Faq | – | – | – | – | – |
What is the best musical streaming service in 2023 ?
The best musical streaming service in 2023: Amazon Music Unlimited
Amazon Music Unlimited is the streaming service most complete at the most accessible price. The € 9.99 subscription gives access to 90 million titles with the CD quality, hi-res quality and 3D sound (Dolby Atmos and Sony 360RA). All reading applications are available: iOS, Android, Windows and MacOS. Finally, Amazon Music Unlimited is compatible with all the major wireless brands.
The alternative: Deezer
Deezer is our second choice. Recently, the platform also offers nearly 90 million titles. If we choose the annual subscription, then it costs € 8.24 per month, that is to say the cheapest subscription of all. At this price, he incorporates CD quality on the entire catalog and a selection of 3D titles. Like Amazon Prime, all applications are available and Deezer is compatible with all wireless speakers. Let’s add one Available customer support via multiple communication channels.
How to make your choice ?
The best streaming service is The one who meets your choice criteria above all. Apparently very similar, they have their own specificities. It’s up to you to decide what are the criteria that matter to you most:
- number of subscribers : if you prefer to trust, or not, at the most used service in the world
- Subscription prices : € 9.99 per month is the classic rate, it can be lower depending on specific offers, or higher to benefit from additional services
- titles catalog : There is no indication that the service offering the most titles will have your favorite albums, each service offers a test offer to check it beforehand
- audio quality : high resolution is accessible from € 9.99; If you are interested in 3D sound, only four services offer it
- Reading applications : all services have their iOS/Android mobile applications, but not all have a dedicated application for PC or Mac computer
- wireless : few wireless speakers and network readers to support all services, check this point before making your decision
- Customer Support : a last essential point if you want to be accompanied by an available after -sales service
multiroom newsletter
Register to receive twice a month In your mailbox the latest connected audio news and the latest articles on the multiroom site.
Your information will not be shared with any third party.
By submitting your information, you accept the Privacy Policy.
Musical streaming platforms, a current revolution
While the artists’ compensation mode is criticized, musical streaming represents 67 % of world music revenues registered.
Streaming platforms dominate the music industry today, which does not prevent them from having to reinvent themselves. Image: Filip / Unsplash.
Posted on September 22, 2023 at 7:21 a.m
616, 2 million. Here is the number of people subscribed to a musical streaming platform according to a study by Midia Research in 2022. In France alone, all of these platforms .
616.2 million. Here is the number of people subscribed to a musical streaming platform according to a study by Midia Research in 2022. In France alone, all of these platforms have 16 million listeners. The impact of Spotify and its competitors was, in 2023, no longer to prove. Musical streaming, since its appearance in the 2000s, has everything of a revolution.
A revolution still in progress, far from being unanimous. The method of remuneration for artists on these applications is more than ever criticized, while giants in the sector are still not profitable. To analyze this market, from its emergence to its economic model, including the lines of reflection to improve it, Digital century met with Sophian Fanen, co -founder of the media Days, Journalist and music enthusiast.
Subscribe to the newsletter
A brief history of music
“” I grew up in the 1980s – 1990s. When I started to be interested in music, finding a record, it was complicated. You had to know that this disc existed, then you had to find it, buy it and it was expensive. Everything was eminently complicated “Remember Sophian Fanen. Followed by music since childhood, the journalist naturally followed and lived as closely as possible the changes in the industry.
The latest, streaming platforms draw its origin in a technology & nbsp: peer-to-peer. However, ” There are several birth acts. Primary is the CD “, He believes. Object today abandoned, if not forgotten, the CD for Compact-Disc, is the first mass digitization of music, in the early 1980s. “” Before, music was a purely acoustic wave. There, it becomes 0 and 1 on CD “He explains, before deepening,” When you connect two computers together, in theory, you can pass these 0 and 1 by a cable between computers and then by internet. So from the moment we have the CD, we germinate all the digitization, the world of music today »».
Then arrive the web, with him the famous MP3 format and the peer-to-peer. The peer -to -peer networks, also called P2P, are decentralized. They allow two devices to share data thanks to the Internet. “” The second big step is the arrival of the Internet with new music compression tools “Confirm the specialist. The compression of music was at that time, in the 1990s, one of the biggest challenges in the music industry. The bandwidth on the Internet is low. To be able to scan and send music, so it must be reduced the size of the pieces, compress them.
“” You have to realize that in the 1990s, sending an email with three lines of text, it was complicated, it took time. So sending music was even more complicated »». Then developed, in the middle of the decade, MP3 technology. Thanks to it, the size of the data is reduced enough to circulate the songs on the web. “” Major revolution, which has become general public thanks to Napster », Sophian Fanen analysis.
Napster is today an online music store, and offers companies to launch their clean brand music service. Image & Nbsp: Christiaan Colen / Flickr.
Napster. The name of a platform that has fallen into disuse, but whose impact was however major. It was a peer-to-peer platform. Internet users from around the world deposited there and downloaded music there. Invoking his memories, the founder of the media Days recalls & nbsp: ” It was all free, pirate, illegal. We were in the gray area of law and the music industry, which has not followed at all »».
New revolution ” completely crazy »». “” All of a sudden, with Napster, I put myself on my chair, I was tapping a few words and I had all the discs to which I could dream “, He says. The MP3 and Napster change music in the digital age. These are the beginnings, the edge of the 2000s, the base is laid. Make way for streaming platforms.
“There will be deaths”
These applications were born towards the late 2000s, with Spotify and Deezer in 2006 and 2007. However, according to Sophian Fanen, the real birth dates rather from the beginning of the 2010s. At the beginning, they organize music in albums and the listener is not guided as today, he is even rather lost. Thus, the one who is also the author of the book Boulevard du Stream – from the MP3 to Deezer, the liberated music, consider the arrival of playlists as ” The real birth of streaming with the general public »». “” Playlists are Spotify around 2014-2015. This is what will really trigger the rocking of uses of the general public »».
Since then, musical streaming platforms have multiplied. Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music and Apple Music are the best known, the most used. However, these giants are not profitable. In the second quarter of 2023, Spotify experienced an increase in turnover of 11% over one year, to reach 3.18 billion euros. Swedish has 551 million monthly active users. Despite these good figures, he recorded a net loss of 302 million euros for this same quarter, against 125 million last year.
Deezer for his part hopes a profitability from 2025. After 15 years of existence, these platforms still can’t do it. For some, this is not a problem. Amazon Music and Apple Music do not need to be profitable. The core business of their mother houses is respectively the retail and sale of electronic products. These services are rather there to attract consumers to their ecosystems. However, all are essentially based on two sources of income. Advertising, broadcast for free subscriptions. Then premium subscriptions, for ten euros per month.
So must subscription prices still increase to allow this market to stabilize and its platforms to be profitable & nbsp? No, Sophian Fanen slice, ” To put the too expensive music, it will become secondary in the expenses of a home »».
“” We have experienced years of expansion with attempts to conquer the market. At one time or another, there will be dead, because there is no room for everyone “Predicts the journalist. According to him, even the giants of the sector are not out of danger & nbsp: ” A platform like Deezer, we like it very much, but is Deezer big enough today to continue to exist independently & nbsp? Complicated »».
It seems necessary to put into perspective the assessment of musical streaming platforms. As Sophian Fanen explains, ” As long as we have the internet, we will have music streaming »». Understand & nbsp: Spotify and Deezer can disappear, music streaming will remain. It also wants to put into perspective the importance of profitability. “” Spotify is listed on the stock market. Its goal is to identify dividends and give money to shareholders. If Spotify had wanted to have perfect accounts for balance and be a family business, they would have stayed in Stockholm »».
In 2021, Spotify largely dominated the streaming music market. Graphic & nbsp: Miia Research.
The method of remuneration of artists questioned
If this model is criticized, it is not because of the lack of profitability. Nor the imbalance created by behemoths like Amazon and Apple. What is attacked is the remuneration of artists. A system inherited from 2007 and the first contract discussed between Sony and Deezer, named Market Centric.
“” To put it simple, we take the available silver cake of such a platform for such a month, by combining advertisements and subscriptions, and we will distribute the shares. 70% go to music players, distributed to market share & NBSP: Universal will have 41% of the French market such as months, so 41% of these 70% will go to Universal “Summarizes Sophian Fanen. Then loads the labels to redistribute the money perceived to their artists according to the contracts.
This is where the problem lies. First of all, for the same stream, two artists will not touch the same amount, a stream having no value or fixed price, unlike a CD. “” A stream of a song in India and France does not have the same value, especially because the cost of living is not the same “, Specifies the musical specialist. A complex and not very readable system.
The listening time that triggers remuneration, set at 31 seconds, is also subject to criticism. Some take advantage of it by publishing several just 31 -second sounds, or even white noise tracks. Majors also attack the importance taken by speechless sounds, such as noise of rain, or even birds. Without forgetting the bots, which can artificially boost the number of listenings of music. Finally, the exponential increase in the number of titles disperses the number of listenings and income. The number of songs on Deezer, in 2 years, has increased from 90 million to… 200 million. 100,000 new titles arrive every day on the platform.
In this emerging context of reflections to develop the model.
Towards a new model & nbsp: Artist, User or Fan Centric & Nbsp?
“” There are reflections to change for the model of User Centric, which is a model where we start from the listening of each artist, it is much more virtuous. But […] I think the time has passed to User Centric », Is convinced Sophian Fanen. The sector would rather go to a Fan Centric model.
The latter should be implemented soon, by Deezer and Universal. The two companies announced on Wednesday, September 6, an agreement. The French application will distinguish professional artists from non-professional. To be professional categorized, it will be necessary to exceed 1000 monthly listening, and have at least 500 unique listeners per month. These artists will benefit from a double bonus & nbsp: each listening will count double. The songs that ” generate an active commitment of fans “, Will also be entitled to this double bonus. These are the songs sought by users, those placed in the playlists of these. Indirectly, the importance of the recommendation algorithm in remuneration will decrease. This model will be launched in France in the fourth quarter of this year and for universal titles. “” It is not uninteresting in the sense that it values fans’ commitment “, Approves the founder of Days.
Other actors may follow Deezer and Universal. Regulation will also have its role to play in the evolution of this market. The European Union planned, for example, to impose on platforms a quota of European artists. “” Spotify is concerned by Digital Services Act “, Adds Sophian Fanen. “” In France we already have regulation. A law says that streaming platforms also pay the musicians who participated in the creation of a work, even if they are not the main artists »».
Future laws and monitoring of musical streaming therefore seem inevitable. “” History tells us that artistic freedom often comes up against its economic existence […] So yes, most likely there will be regulation strategies in the decade to come. It is not necessarily a bad thing, it depends on the way it is done. Very clearly, if it is a regulation which is made by the national rally, it will not be good “, He concludes.
Best 2023 musical streaming services: the comparison
Follow on
At first, the wide range of continuous music listening services can be a bit overwhelming, not to mention the choice of subscription that will offer you the best value for money. Nowadays, each platform has its own niche: audiophiles will probably turn to Tidal, while podcast lovers will appreciate Spotify and its library ever more supplied.
Contents
- Best streaming music subscription: Spotify
- The best for musical quality: Tidal
- The best for music addicts: Apple Music
- The best French alternatives: Deezer
- Other music streaming services
- Soundcloud
- Qobuz
- Amazon Music
- YouTube Music
- Napster
In this guide, you will find a comparison of the main music streaming platforms. The goal ? Help you choose the one that suits you best. We have included musical applications which, in our view, are worth it because of their content, their quality and their unique offer. Note that there are other musical streaming services that do not appear in this list. Qobuz, for example, can boast of offering a superior file quality, but its library is limited and its costly subscription.
In addition, we tell you how to save on the subscription to the music streaming service of your choice. All prices of the subscriptions indicated are correct when writing this guide in early August 2023.
Best streaming music subscription: Spotify
Spotify is the first stopover of most people for listening to music streaming. This is undoubtedly the biggest name in musical streaming, with more 500 million users in the world. Users can listen to music on the free application, with advertisements, or subscribe to a Premium subscription for 10.99 euros per month.
There free version Give the right to six zappings per hour and at a random listening of 70 million songs, making it one of the best free streaming music services. Disadvantage ? With a free account, you must be online to listen. Admittedly, the office version of the musical app offers an unlimited number of zappings, but advertisements, many advertisements. These are generally broadcast every 15 minutes for subscription without subscription and last at most 30 seconds.
Spotify Premium is undoubtedly the best musical application in terms of user experience and choice of songs. It allows you to create reading lists and share them with your friends, with a choice of 100 million titles. Not to mention the huge selection of podcasts and other content broadcast continuously. The talent of Spotify to create mixes and playlists based on what you listen to (and like) the most, as well as its vast catalog, is a real success.
THE students benefit from a reduction by paying only € 5.99 per month. It is also possible to save money by subscribing to a family formula. This subscription offers six accounts for only € 17.99 per month. Whether for you and your family or for a group of friends, you will save a significant sum. There is also the duo account for two listeners, which costs € 14.99, A good deal for a couple.
There is always a way to get a Free Spotify trial period. New users benefit from a free trial month and three months ago free trial via Paypal if you choose this payment method when registering. It is then € 10.99 per month. All the latest spotify free trial offers in France are listed on our Spotify page, don’t forget to take a look to save on your subscription.