Ryzen 5 5600X Equivalent Intel

Comparison of performance between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmarks software such as Geekbench.

Intel Core i5-12600k vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: which is the best for your PC ?

We can understand the craze for comparisons between the best existing processors, as between theIntel Core i9-12900k and the Ryzen 5950X AMD, But most processor buyers are more interested in the mid -range. This is where we find the best price-performance reports, and the most interesting duel is currently played between the Intel Core i5-12600k and the AMD Ryzen 5600x.

Does the new Intel architecture make the 12600K more interesting than the 5600X ? Continue reading to discover it.

Prices and availability

The Ryzen 5600X of AMD was put on the market in November 2020 with an announced price of around 315 euros. Because of the shortages, he continued to be sold at much higher prices for a good part of the year 2021, but it has become less rare to find it at the price announced. It would not be surprising to see Amd Brader his Ryzen 5000 mid -range fairly quickly.

The Core i5-12600k officially arrived on the market on November 4, 2021 with a recommended price of around 320 euros. However, it is not rare either to see it at higher prices. Even the biggest resellers do not yet have a lot of stocks, and although we can find this processor without too much trouble, it is not always in immediate stock.

• Intel Core i5-12600k
• 6 performance-cores (3.6 GHz – 4.9 GHz) + 4 Efficient-Cores (2.8 GHz – 3.6 GHz)
• Processor 10 Cores / 16 Threads

• NB of CPU cores 6 . Processor technology for processor cores: TSMC 7 Nm finish
• NB of threads 12
• Basic frequency 3.7GHz
• Unbridled yes
• Maximum memory speed up to 3200mhz ddr4

Features

Big architecture.Little of Intel which appeared with the Alder Lake generation is not really a revolution, it has already been seen in ARM and the Apple processors. It is however a novelty for Intel, and they managed to combine energy efficient e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-into-laws with more powerful P-Cores. The processor e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-dores are to treat all the little greedy tasks like those that run in the background for example, while P-Cores are reserved for the most delicious tasks.

The table below compares the different characteristics of the Core i5 and Ryzen 5000, in particular the number of cores. We can see that the i5 has 6 p-cores against the hearts of the Ryzen, but also 4 e-cores.

Intel Core i5-12600k	AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Cores	P: 6 E: 4	6
Threads	16	12
TDP	125 W	65 W
Frequency	P: 3.7 GHz E: 2.8 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost	P: 4.9 GHz E: 3.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Overclockable	Yes	Yes
L3 cache	20 Mb	32 MB
Engraving finesse	10 nm	7 nm
Memory	DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 Up to 128 GB	DDR4-3200 Up to 128 GB
Integrated graphic chipset	UHD Graphics 770	None
Socket	LGA 1700	AM4

The Ryzen 5 5600X is compatible with PCIe 4.0 so that your components are faster, and supports the DDR4 up to 128 GB. The Core i5-12600k went to PCIe 5.0 and DDR, even if these characteristics are not yet real sales arguments. There DDR5 for 12th generation Intel processors is incredibly expensive and difficult to find, and the PCIe 5 standard.0 has not yet entered the game. It’s still good to have a time testor.

There New i5 architecture also requires a new LGA 1700 socket. This means that your old motherboard will not be compatible with the 12th generation of processors. The config only becomes more expensive. The Ryzen 5 5600X still uses the AM4 socket, so the old configs will undoubtedly be compatible. Despite everything, go to one of the best motherboards can make a sacred difference in general performance.

The Ryzen 5 does not embark on an integrated graphic chip, while the Core i5 is equipped with the UHD Graphics 770. It is not very important for an office PC, because most of the time we add one of the best graphics cards on the market. A Ventirad is well included with the Ryzen 5, but this is not the case with the Core i5.

If you are a gamer wanting to go to the next generation, one or the other of these processors will do very good work. The frequencies are similar, the number of hearts is similar (even if the i5 has more e-cores) and the two CPUs are overclockable. However, the 65 W TDP from the Ryzen 5 is much less important than that of 125 W from the Core i5.

Alder Lake motherboards can also take advantage of the Thunderbolt 4 and Wi-Fi 6th, offering much faster wired and wireless transfer speeds than at AMD.

Preview	Product	Assessment
	Intel Core i5-12600k alder Lake-s (3.7GHz) processor (3.7GHz)	No notes	See Amazon reviews
	AMD Ryzen 5,5600x 3.7 GHz processor 32 MB L3 Black box	No notes	See Amazon reviews

Performance

The Ryzen 5600X has always been one of our favorite processors, since its release. It offers very good multi -thread and gaming performance. Although he stood up to competition thanks to his price-performance report when it was released, the Alder Lake generation has arrived and the game is increasingly tight.

At stake, the Intel Core i5-12600k is a real beast. Its six P-Cores Golden Cove offer incredible mono-heart performance, perfect for gaming. In the gaming panel tested we have titles like Forza Horizon 4 and Civilization VI, and the 12600K surpasses not only the Ryzen 5600X, but a lot of more powerful processors in the series. The latest generation Intel is fully found in the pickup, and in many cases, the 12600K approaches not far from the Core i9-12900k. Much more expensive, but without hesitation the king of gaming.

The Core i5-12600k is undoubtedly the best gaming processor of its generation from a value for money.

In some cases the AMD processors manage to keep the distance, this is particularly the case with titles such as Assassin’s Creed Valhalla And Microsoft Flight Simulator, But even in these cases, the 12600K remains incredibly competitive and is only behind one or two images per second.

The Core i5-12600k is undoubtedly the best gaming processor of its generation from a value for money, and it makes AMD’s hand forget in the mid-range market from last year.

In the field of productivity, which was dominated by AMD for years, the 12600K is once again incredibly well. By pulling the best party of its Gracemont e-cores, this 10-core processor (six plus four) buries the six cores of poor 5600x and manages 10 to 30 % better in most of the most popular benchs on the market. Although the Ryzen 9 5950X still manages to keep its title in this area, let’s not forget that it is much more expensive than the 12600K. In this account, even the Intel 12900K offers a better price-performance report, even if the performance is sometimes behind.

The only reserve to be taken into account is that most of these figures were obtained by taking advantage of the DDR5 that the 12600K allows to use. Not only is it a memory that you cannot recycle from your old builds, but in addition, it is very expensive and few mother cards are currently compatible. DDR4 is not likely to destroy its performance, especially in gaming, but it may affect them. The 12600 is therefore a very good game processor, and at a good price in addition to that, but it implies a fairly expensive upgrade.

Power and temperatures

This is another cost to take into account: the power. The Core i5-12600k is very energy-consuming for a mid-range processor. Although it takes full advantage of Intel 7 architecture (engraving in 10 Nm) and its e-cores help reduce the demand for power and thermal dissipation in the context of limited use, its needs climb in arrow as soon as it is pushed a little. Its TDP is 125 W, but pushed in its entrenchments for more performance, its TDP can increase to 150 W.

This remains more effective than the previous generation of Intel processors that could consume much more for much less performance, but it is not negligible.

As impressive as it is, the 12600K requires double power and thermal dissipation when compared to AMD architecture.

In comparison, the Ryzen 5600x has a 65 W TDP, and even if it was noted that it could be superior in full load or if it has enough thermal margin for overclocking, it generally does not exceed the 70 W, or of little.

Although the 12600K is impressive, its architecture requires twice as much power and thermal dissipation. This represents as much additional pressure on your cooling system and your diet. Ryzen processors remain better for more reduced systems or if you have constraints for your cooling system. This is all the more true if you want to accommodate a big graphics card in addition.

The Core i5-12600k is the best in play, but it has a price

Intel paid the high price for staying at 14 Nm, AMD had enough time to catch up with several Ryzen processors with Zen 3 architecture that dominated the gaming segment all last year. But now the 12600K and the other processors of the Alder Lake generation have overturned the steam by offering still unequaled gaming performance. By increasing the number of hearts in its mid -range processors as AMD did with its first generation of Ryzen processors, Intel has managed to improve its performance enough to match or even overshadow AMD in the mid -range.

The Core i5-12600k is a prodigy of performance, but as Intel, it also pays a heavy price because of the stagnation of Intel. It is a processor that is at the cutting edge of technology, but it is already exceeded on certain points. If it is pleasant to see Intel go to 10 Nm (which they call Intel 7) on our machines, it happens years after AMD which has passed to a real engraving 7 nm TSMC. In addition to its finesse of engraving and the fact that it focuses on fewer hearts, the Ryzen 5,5600x is more effective from a thermal point of view, but also quieter.

Finally, all this does not matter if you want a big machine for gaming or a production machine at a low price, the 12600K is clearly the best processor you can offer yourself. However, if you need something more reduced or consumption matters to you, then this is a point to take into consideration.

• Intel Core i5-12600k
• 6 performance-cores (3.6 GHz – 4.9 GHz) + 4 Efficient-Cores (2.8 GHz – 3.6 GHz)
• Processor 10 Cores / 16 Threads

Ryzen 5 5600X Equivalent Intel

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600x on one side and the Intel Core i5-12400 on the other, as well as their respective performance with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop computer sector, it has 6 hearts, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.6 GHz. The second is used on the desktop computer segment, it has a total of 6 hearts, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is 4.4 GHz. The following table also makes it possible to compare lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the quantity of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first dissemination, the maximum number of PCIe lines , the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links.

This page contains references to the products of one or more of our advertisers. We can receive compensation when you click on links to these products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Comparison of characteristics:

100-000000065,
100-100000065BOX,
100-100000065MPK

CM8071504555317,
CM8071504650608,
BX8071512400,
SRL4V, srl5y

6 hearts 12 threads @ 3.7/4.6 GHz

6 cores 12 threads @ 2.5/4.4 GHz

Gaussian & Neural Accelerator

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key

Enhanced Virus Protection

OS Guard,
Execute Disable Bit,
Boot Guard,
Mode-Based Execute Control,
CONTROL-FLOW SPORING TECHNOLOGY

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
5120 x 3200@120Hz (EDP)
Note: commissions can be won from the above links.

We can thus better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Recommended system power supply: We assume that we have an ATX tower, a high-end graphics card, 16GB of RAM memory, an SSD 512GB SSD disk, an HDD 1TB hard drive, a Blu-ray player. It will be necessary to count on a more powerful diet if you want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: for technical reasons, we cannot display for the moment a price of less than 24 hours, or a price in real time. This is why we prefer for the moment not to make prices appear. You have to refer to the respective online stores to find out the last price, as well as the availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of hearts, the maximum frequency of the AMD Ryzen 5,5600x is higher, that their respective PDTs are of the same order. The Intel Core i5-12400 has been launched more recently.

Comparison of performance in benchmarks:

Comparison of performance between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmarks software such as Geekbench.

CPU-Z-Multi-Thread & Simple Thread score
Intel Core i5-12400	670 4.972
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	629 4.871

In simple heart, the difference is 7%. In multi-gone, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

CPU-Z is system information software that provides the processor name, model number, code name, cache levels, package, the process. It can also issue data on the motherboard, memory. He makes real -time measures, with finally a benchmark for the simple thread, as well as for the multi thread.

Cinebench R15 – Multi -Thread & Simple Thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	261 1.971
Intel Core i5-12400	248 1.823

In simple heart, the difference is 5%. In multi-sisters, the differential gap is 8%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

Cinebench R15 makes it possible to assess the CPU calculation performance by restoring a photorealist 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses net and blurred reflections, light areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antiialiasing, etc. The faster the rendering of the scene, the more powerful the PC, with a high number of points.

Cinebench R20 – Multi -Thread & Simple Thread score
Intel Core i5-12400	637 4.773
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	605 4.434

In simple heart, the difference is 5%. In multi-gone, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple hearts and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

Cinebench R23 – Multi -Thread & Simple Thread score
Intel Core i5-12400	1.683 12.352
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	1.531 11,190

In simple heart, the difference is 10%. In multi-gone, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

Cinebench R23 is a multi-platform test software which allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple hearts and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

Passmark – CPU Mark & ​​Simple Thread
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	3.378 22.192
Intel Core i5-12400	3.038 17,124

In simple heart, the difference is 11%. In multi-sisters, the differential gap is 30%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

Passmark is benchmarks software, which does several performance tests, in particular, on prime numbers, whole numbers, floating comma, compression, physics, extensive instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the scoring, the more the device has significant capacities.

With Windows:

Geekbench 4 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Heart score – Windows
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	6.975 33.553
Intel Core i5-12400	7.313 32.290

In simple heart, the difference is -5%. In multi-sisters, the differential gap is 4%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 4 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – Linux score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	6.975 38,157
Intel Core i5-12400	6.681 29.855

In simple heart, the difference is 4%. In multi-sisters, the differential gap is 28%.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – Android score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	5.583 28.808
Intel Core i5-12400	6.531 26.208

In simple heart, the difference is -15%. In multi-sisters, the differential gap is 10%.

With Mac OS X:

Geekbench 4 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – Mac OS X
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	9.573 46.982
Intel Core i5-12400	5.309 31.751

In simple heart, the difference is 80%. In multi-gone, the differential gap is 48%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a benchmarks platform complete with several types of tests, including data compression, images, encryption in AES, encoding in SQL, HTML, rendering a PDF file, matrix calculation, Rapid Fourier transformation, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory tests. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values ​​on the famous benchmarks software.

With Windows:

Geekbench 5 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – Windows score
Intel Core i5-12400	2.104 8.609
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	1.616 8.275

In simple heart, the difference is 30%. In multi-sisters, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 5 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – Linux score
Intel Core i5-12400	1.816 9.158
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	1.752 9.040

In simple heart, the difference is 4%. In multi-gone, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – Android score
Intel Core i5-12400	1.623 8.784
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	1.334 7.457

In simple heart, the difference is 22%. In multi-gone, the difference in terms of gap is 18%.

With macOS:

Geekbench 5 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – MacOS score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	1.654 8.416
Intel Core i5-12400	1.136 7.891

In simple heart, the difference is 46%. In multi-sisters, the differential gap is 7%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

Geekbench 5 is performance measurement software for a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and compare it with similar or completely different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we find in reality.

With Windows:

Geekbench 6 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Heart score – Windows
Intel Core i5-12400	2.296 9.638
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	2.202 9.476

In simple heart, the difference is 4%. In multi-gone, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 6 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – Linux score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	2.336 10.548
Intel Core i5-12400	2.499 10.480

In simple heart, the difference is -7%. In multi-sisters, the differential gap is 1%.

With macOS:

Geekbench 6 – Multi -Coeur & Simple Coeur – MacOS score
Intel Core i5-12400	2.159 8.193
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	1.978 8.106

In simple heart, the difference is 9%. In multi-gone, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.

Note: commissions can be won from the above links. These scores are only
average performance obtained with these processors, you can get different results.

Geekbench 6 is a benchmarks platform that is capable of assessing the performance of a device on several operating systems. The software assesses the power of the processor, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, navigation; The possibilities of calculating the graphic processor, with the editing of images, videos, skills in video games, automatic learning workloads.

Equivalence:

See as well :

Warning :

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this may result that this site wins a commission. Affiliation programs and affiliations include, but without being limited to, Ebay Partner Network.

As a Amazon partner, I make a profit on purchases fulfilling the required conditions.

This page includes affiliation links for which the GadgetVersus administrator can win a commission at no additional cost if you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #pub.

Information :

We assume no responsibility for the data displayed on our site. Please use at your own risk. A part or all of this data can be expired or obsolete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up -to -date information concerning the specificities of this product.