Comparison Samsung Galaxy A52S against Samsung Galaxy A53 5G., DUEL COMPARATION: Samsung Galaxy A53 5G VS Galaxy A52S 5G – Digital
DUEL: Samsung Galaxy A53 5G VS Galaxy A52S 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52S 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52S against Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
The Galaxy A52S is a mid -range smartphone signed Samsung. Very slight evolution of the A52 (it uses the Snapdragon 778G processor), this smartphone has a 6.5 -inch AMOLED screen at the 120 Hz refresh rate. Android 11 and one UI 3.1, it has 6… | Read more
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a mid -range smartphone with a 6.5 -inch Super AMOLED screen at 120 Hz. It works with Android 12 and one UI 4.1, ships the Samsung Exynos 1280 processor, has 6 GB or 8 GB of RAM… | Read more
Technical characteristics
User interface
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
Processor frequency
Memory cards support
Type of supported cards
Protection index (waterproofing)
Footprints, facial recognition
Repairability
Wi-Fi 802.11a, Wi-Fi 802.11b, Wi-Fi 802.11AC, Wi-Fi 802.11g, Wi-Fi 802.11n
Wi-Fi 802.11a, Wi-Fi 802.11b, Wi-Fi 802.11AC, Wi-Fi 802.11g, Wi-Fi 802.11n
Infra-Rouge support (IRDA)
USB connector type
USB Host compatibility
Screen technology
Screen definition
Screen resolution
Refresh frequency
850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 1900 MHz
850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 1900 MHz
5G network compatible
Main photo sensor
Second photo sensor
Third photo sensor
Fourth photo sensor
Definition of video recording (main)
Video recording definition (facade)
Front photo sensor 1
TOF sensor on the front
Battery capacity
Charger power
Buy at the best price
Samsung Galaxy A52S.
Motorola Razr 40
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
The latest news
iOS 17 resets confidentiality parameters without your consent
iOS 17 does not mix well with certain medical devices
The new AirPods Pro 2 have something more, and not it is not that the USB-C box
Dead monkeys because of the neuralink implants: Elon Musk would have lied
Smartphone confiscation, digital curfew: measures against cyberbullying are looming
⚖️ DUEL: Samsung Galaxy A53 5G VS Galaxy A52S 5G
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52S 5G
Mid -range stars at Samsung, the Galaxy A5X are among its best sales. However, generations follow each other and are very similar, so much so that the choice is not easy. Between the Samsung Galaxy A52s and Galaxy A53, what is the best deal ? The answer is in this duel.
Lab test
User opinion
Strong points
- Photo shutter better controlled than that of the Galaxy A52.
- AMOLED screen of good quality.
- IP67 certification.
- Very good finish.
- Quality finishes.
- Perfectly calibrated screen.
- Performance significantly higher than those of the Galaxy A52 5G.
- Good autonomy.
- IP67 waterproofing certification.
Weak points
- Average graphics performance.
- Correct autonomy, but less than that of the Galaxy A52.
- Disappearance of the jack.
- Disappointing photo shutter.
- Load in 1 h 30 min.
Ergonomics and design
Weight | 189 g | Weight | 189 g |
Type of sealing | IP67 | Type of sealing | IP67 |
Memory card | Yes | Memory card | Yes |
Connection | USB-C | Connection | USB-C |
Dimensions | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm | Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm |
Share of the screen on the surface | 85.8 % | Share of the screen on the surface | 85.3 % |
Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Fingerprint sensor | Yes |
Induction load | No | Induction load | No |
Shockproof | No | Shockproof | No |
If there is one point on which you are not likely to be surprised, it is that of appearance. Indeed, Samsung has chosen to resume the design of the A52S for its A53. The dimensions of the new model are slightly reduced, but it is very difficult to distinguish the two smartphones at first glance. Both bet on a plastic design, but with good finishes and a photo island perfectly integrated into the hull. In short, Samsung understood that its design pleased and does not hesitate to renew it over the generations.
The two devices have an IP67 standard. In terms of connectivity, the A52S benefits from Bluetooth 5.0 while the A53 opts for Bluetooth 5.1 as well as Wi-Fi 6 standard. High improvements which however allow the Galaxy A53 to take stock on this round.
Screen
Screen diagonal | 6.5 inches | Screen diagonal | 6.5 inches |
Screen definition | 2400 x 1080 px | Screen definition | 2400 x 1080 px |
Resolution | 405 ppi | Resolution | 405 ppi |
Our laboratory measures | Our laboratory measures | ||
Delta E | 1.8 | Delta E | 1.8 |
Color temperature | 6775 Kelvins | Color temperature | 6707 Kelvins |
Contrast rate | 5000: 1 | Contrast rate | 5000: 1 |
Maximum brightness | 823 cd/m² | Maximum brightness | 833 cd/m² |
Minimal brightness | 1.9 CD/m² | Minimal brightness | 1.8 cd/m² |
Tactile delay | 70 ms | Tactile delay | 53 ms |
Recording time | 0 ms | Recording time | 0 ms |
Reflectance | 50 % | Reflectance | 51.3 % |
The differences between the screens are imperceptible. The two smartphones incorporate a 6.5 -inch Super Amoled slab, with a definition of 2400 x 1080 pixels as well as a 120 Hz refresh rate (non -adaptive). However, the sleeve returns to the Galaxy A52S, a short head. The previous model has for him a slightly higher maximum brightness, a very slightly better controlled color temperature, as well as a more limited touch delay (53 against 70 ms). A round that is therefore played on tenuous details, so much so that we are dealing here with a quasi-equality.
Performance
Mobile chip | Exynos 1280 | Mobile chip | Snapdragon 778g |
Processor | Cortex A78 / Cortex A55 – 2.4 GHz | Processor | Kryo 670 – 2.4 GHz |
Number of hearts | 8 | Number of hearts | 8 |
Integrated GPU (IGPU) | Mali-G68 MC4 | Integrated GPU (IGPU) | Adreno 642L |
RAM (RAM) | 6 GB | RAM (RAM) | 6 GB |
Our laboratory measures | Our laboratory measures | ||
Multi-tasin index | 92 | Multi-tasin index | 96 |
Game index | 64 | Game index | 153 |
Middle image | 36 I/S | Middle image | 66.8 I/S |
Overall index | 78 | Overall index | 125 |
The Samsung Galaxy A53 is freed from Qualcomm and rests on its home platform. This is how the exynos 1280 appears, the most recent chip of the South Korean manufacturer. The Galaxy A52S offers it a Snapdragon 778g (for “Gaming”), an excellent mid -range chip that knew how to impress us during its passage on note bench.
One thing that we cannot really say with the exynos of the A53. Indeed, the Samsung chip has been very below expectations; A bit like the exynos 2200 that we can find within the Galaxy S22. For example, the Galaxy A53 displays on average only 34 i/s when the A52S stabilizes around 86 i/s, that is to say much more than double. A fairly impressive disparity.
Photo
Video capture | 4K | Video capture | 4K |
Rear photo module 1 | 64 Mpx, Grand Angle, f/1.8 | Rear photo module 1 | 64 Mpx, Grand Angle, f/1.8 |
Rear photo module 2 | 12 Mpx, Ultra Grand Angle, F/2.2 | Rear photo module 2 | 12 Mpx, Ultra Grand Angle, F/2.2 |
Rear photo module 3 | 5 mpx, macro, f/2.4 | Rear photo module 3 | 5 mpx, depth, f/2.4 |
Rear photo module 4 | 5 mpx, depth, f/2.4 | Rear photo module 4 | 5 mpx, macro, f/2.4 |
The Galaxy A52S rested on a photo block with four modules, and this is always the case with the A53. Both have a main module of 64 megapixels, coupled with another ultra-angle of 12 megapixels. A macro objective as well as a depth sensor complete the panoply and complete 5 megapixel sensors each. For its new mid -range smartphone, the Korean firm has made great efforts in terms of photo. This results in much more detailed day -to -day shots as well as a much better exposure. The contrast is also less pronounced. At night, it’s the same song. The A53 manages to offer a much more usable image, despite the very smoothing applied by the software.
Autonomy
Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | Battery capacity | 4500 mAh |
Our laboratory measures | Our laboratory measures | ||
Measured autonomy | 17 hours) | Measured autonomy | 21 hours) |
Loading time | 78 minutes | Loading time | 89 minutes |
In terms of autonomy, victory returns to the Galaxy A52S. Indeed, even by having a less substantial accumulator (4,500 mAh vs 5000 mAh on the A53), the latter will have managed to hold the charge for almost 21 hours. A score fairly distant from that of the latest Born of Samsung, which made arms after 4 h 43 min.
For recharging, the two mobiles are housed in the same brand. It is done at 25 W and it takes between 1 h 20 min and 1 h 30 min to reach 100 %. An important clarification however: Samsung no longer delivers a load block with its new galaxy has. Thus, the A53 is delivered alone and it will therefore be necessary to recycle an old charger or acquire a new.
Verdict
Even if the Galaxy A53 5G is winning this duel, it’s on the wire. The Galaxy A52S shines in particular by its performance and its autonomy, which remain much better than those of its successor. The Galaxy A53 offers a much more pleasant photo part, and earns an extended update guarantee (four versions of Android). In short, if we except the criterion nevertheless crucial of software sustainability, the Galaxy A52S, with its price reductions, constitutes a better performance/price ratio than its successor, and especially a good deal.
Launch price 460 €
Rakuten
Amazon Marketplace
Amazon
Crossroads
Cdiscount
Rakuten
Amazon Marketplace
Crossroads
Amazon
Rakuten
Amazon Marketplace
Amazon
Rakuten
Amazon Marketplace
Crossroads
Cdiscount
Rakuten
Amazon Marketplace
Operation of the price board
Disable your advertising blocker to access all links above.
Not easy to succeed the Galaxy A52 and A52S. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has new priorities. He takes over with a certain mastery in terms of ergonomics and display. The smartphone enjoys a successful AMOLED screen, which therefore allows you to enjoy multimedia content pleasantly. He also has the merit of presenting a much more satisfactory photo component than that of his elders, which makes it a more versatile model. The assessment is on the other hand halftone with regard to power and autonomy, correct, but lower than last year. These downsides aside, Samsung has the merit of carrying its promise of software updates at 4 years on this Galaxy A53 5G, no longer reserving this favor for its Galaxy S22: its sustainability, which we observe with attention, found increased.